Abstract
Inputted have been the lists of main dolphin bones from the District at
the Mawaki site: craniums (105 pieces), mandibles (65 pieces), scapulas
(190 pieces), radiuses (141 pieces), ulnas (119 pieces) and articulated
vertebras from an excavation grid of 6m by 15m (with an additional 1/2u
for one unit) within Stratum ]T; humeri (187 pieces) from Stratum ]T and
atlases (286 pieces) from the stratums.
Six pairs (18.46%) of mandibles were searched out as those of the same
individuals or@of their high possibilities by a rough pairing method.
Two pairs@(2.14%) of humeri were@searched out as those of the same individuals
or of their high possibilities by a minute pairing method. And three sets
(9.38%) of articulated vertebras were searched@out as those of the same
individuals or of their high possibilities; their data was inputted with
length measurements of corpus vertebrae of a present Lagenorhynchus
obliquidens. Only a few examples of the same individuals or of their
high possibilities were searched out, either by the humeri pairing or the
individual identification of articulated vertebras, although excavated
from dumps near a butchery facing a fishery coast.
It may be assumed that, if a catch was poor for labor mobilization, members
ofneighboring settlements working together in dolphin fishing, it was impossible
for a settlement to have a share of a whole dolphin or that, if different
parts probably of some usefulness were divided and distributed among settlements,
where they were further butchered, the bone remains were thrown into each
dump. It is necessary for verification of this hypothesis to promote individual
identification analyses between different parts: craniums, mandibles, atlases,
humeri and others.
Key Words
Individual identification, Taphonomy, Zoo-archaeology,
Animal remains, Pairing, Dolphin fishing, Mawaki site, Jomon-period
iMarch, 1993j
|